It's very useful when testing cominations of integration operations to achieve a desired splitting of peaks in a chromatogram to be able to enable/disable the individual rows in the integration table. This allows the effect of each operation, and its interaction with other operations, to be tested. In other chromatography systems I have used, a checkbox in each row of the integration table permits this to be done.
When the functionality of integration tables is enhanced to permit re-ordering of operations, could this feature perhaps be added as well?
Kind regards
Stephen
Internal issue number: ISS66006
Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation
Forum rules
You have to be logged in to be able to vote.
This section lists feature requests with polls. You can:
You have to be logged in to be able to vote.
This section lists feature requests with polls. You can:
- Vote for the feature to increase its priority and discuss how it should be implemented.
- How to vote? Just log in to your forum account and the voting options will appear.
- If you have not found your desired feature here, create a new thread for it.
- You will not be able to create the poll yourself, but after the checking of the suggestion, we will create the poll for you.
Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation
Stephen Haines
-
Daniel Mentlik
- DataApex Support
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation
Dear Stephen,
thank you for the suggestion. We are preparing a design to make work with Integration table easier for some future version of Clarity. The preliminary version of the design is going slightly different route, but could be fully combined with your suggested operation. I have added a new suggestion into our internal bug-tracking database and started a poll in this thread.
Daniel
thank you for the suggestion. We are preparing a design to make work with Integration table easier for some future version of Clarity. The preliminary version of the design is going slightly different route, but could be fully combined with your suggested operation. I have added a new suggestion into our internal bug-tracking database and started a poll in this thread.
Daniel
Daniel Mentlík
DataApex
DataApex
