Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation

This section allows you to vote for new features that may be implemented into Clarity.
Forum rules
You have to be logged in to be able to vote.
This section lists feature requests with polls. You can:
  • Vote for the feature to increase its priority and discuss how it should be implemented.
  • How to vote? Just log in to your forum account and the voting options will appear.
  • If you have not found your desired feature here, create a new thread for it.
  • You will not be able to create the poll yourself, but after the checking of the suggestion, we will create the poll for you.
We do take this poll seriously, however it is not the only source of priorities for the development.
Post Reply

Would you use an option to disable particular lines of Integration table?

Yes.
3
100%
No.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 3

kiwiSteve
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:39 am

Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation

Post by kiwiSteve »

It's very useful when testing cominations of integration operations to achieve a desired splitting of peaks in a chromatogram to be able to enable/disable the individual rows in the integration table. This allows the effect of each operation, and its interaction with other operations, to be tested. In other chromatography systems I have used, a checkbox in each row of the integration table permits this to be done.

When the functionality of integration tables is enhanced to permit re-ordering of operations, could this feature perhaps be added as well?

Kind regards
Stephen

Internal issue number: ISS66006
Stephen Haines

User avatar
Daniel Mentlik
DataApex Support
DataApex Support
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Check box in integration table to enable/disable operation

Post by Daniel Mentlik »

Dear Stephen,
thank you for the suggestion. We are preparing a design to make work with Integration table easier for some future version of Clarity. The preliminary version of the design is going slightly different route, but could be fully combined with your suggested operation. I have added a new suggestion into our internal bug-tracking database and started a poll in this thread.

Daniel
Daniel Mentlí­k
DataApex

Post Reply